yard: be at house development

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.57
, game
Weight: 0.56
, distance
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.56
Siblings deck
Weight: 0.56
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, zone
Weight: 0.32
, football game
Weight: 0.32
, backyard
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at house development 1.00
be at house 0.76
has house 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(backyard, be at house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(backyard, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(backyard, be at house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(yard, be at house development)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(yard, be at house)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(yard, be at house)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(yard, has house)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(yard, has house)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(yard, be at house)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(yard, be at house development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(yard, be at house development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(yard, be at house development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(backyard, be at house)