young girls: were raised in ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
were raised in ages 1.00
were raised in middle ages 0.97
get at young age 0.77
get at age 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(young girls, were raised in ages)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(young girls, were raised in middle ages)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(young girls, were raised in middle ages)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(young girls, were raised in middle ages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(young girls, get at young age)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(young girls, get at age)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(young girls, were raised in middle ages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(young girls, get at young age)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(young girls, get at age)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(young girls, get at age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(young girls, get at age)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(young girls, get at young age)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(young girls, get at young age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(young girls, were raised in ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(young girls, were raised in ages)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(young girls, were raised in ages)