youth: driving problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.60
, young people
Weight: 0.59
, club
Weight: 0.59
Siblings boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, troop
Weight: 0.46
, arsonist
Weight: 0.43
, young man
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
driving problem 1.00
has state problem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(youth, driving problem)

Similarity expansion

0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(youth, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(youth, has state problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(youth, has state problem)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(youth, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(youth, driving problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(youth, driving problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(youth, driving problem)