zebra: is are poached

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings quagga
Weight: 0.43
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, giraffe
Weight: 0.37
, cheetah
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are poached 1.00
is poached 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is are poached)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is are poached)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is are poached)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(rhino, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rhino, is are poached)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(elephant, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elephant, is are poached)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cheetah, is are poached)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(zebra, is are poached)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(zebra, is poached)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(zebra, is poached)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zebra, is poached)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is poached)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zebra, is are poached)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rhino, is are poached)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cheetah, is are poached)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(elephant, is are poached)