:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, travel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, travel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(elephant, travel)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(zebra, travel)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(zebra, travel)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cheetah, travel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(giraffe, travel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(zebra, travel)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(elephant, travel)