:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(buddha, is famous)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(zeus, was famous)
Similarity expansion
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(zeus, is famous)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(zeus, is famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(zeus, is famous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(zeus, is famous)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(zeus, was famous)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(zeus, was famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(buddha, is famous)