zoo: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.58
Siblings elephant
Weight: 0.61
, african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35
, park
Weight: 0.35
, giraffe
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(park, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(park, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(zoo, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(zoo, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(park, be at city)