ability: pay principle important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strength
Weight: 0.66
, achievement
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, force
Weight: 0.61
Siblings speed
Weight: 0.64
, leadership
Weight: 0.63
, vision
Weight: 0.63
, precognition
Weight: 0.62
, lack
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay principle important 1.00
is pay 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ability, pay principle important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(variable, is pay)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(variable, is pay)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ability, pay principle important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ability, pay principle important)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ability, is pay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ability, is pay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ability, is pay)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ability, is pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ability, pay principle important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ability, pay principle important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(variable, is pay)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ability, pay principle important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(variable, is pay)