absinthe: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beverage
Weight: 0.62
, spirit
Weight: 0.61
, drink
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, hallucinogen
Weight: 0.51
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.35
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.35
, white wine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality worth 0.85
be good for health 0.80
taste good 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
taste better out of can 0.77
be bad for health 0.77
be bad for us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(spirit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(spirit, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of can)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be good for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(white wine, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(white wine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(white wine, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(drinking beer, is quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(vodka, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(vodka, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(absinthe, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(vodka, be good for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drinking beer, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(white wine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)