absinthe: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beverage
Weight: 0.62
, spirit
Weight: 0.61
, drink
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, hallucinogen
Weight: 0.51
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.35
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.35
, white wine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for health 0.81
taste bad 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
go bad 0.79
be good for health 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(spirit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drink, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(spirit, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(white wine, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(white wine, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be good for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hallucinogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(white wine, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(white wine, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(white wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(white wine, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(drinking beer, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(vodka, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(vodka, be good for health)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(absinthe, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(absinthe, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(absinthe, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(absinthe, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(white wine, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(white wine, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(vodka, be good for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drinking beer, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hallucinogen, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(absinthe, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)