academy: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.68
, organization
Weight: 0.65
, club
Weight: 0.58
, public school
Weight: 0.57
Siblings institute
Weight: 0.35
, school district
Weight: 0.34
, secondary school
Weight: 0.34
, golf club
Weight: 0.33
, college
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
be better than state schools 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(public school, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(public school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(club, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(school district, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(college, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(public school, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(public school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(college, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(college, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(school district, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(school district, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(academy, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(academy, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(academy, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(academy, be better than state schools)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(academy, be better than state schools)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(academy, be better than state schools)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(academy, be better than state schools)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(public school, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(college, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(school district, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(public school, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(academy, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)