institute: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.69
, university
Weight: 0.68
, organization
Weight: 0.66
, center
Weight: 0.62
Siblings academy
Weight: 0.35
, financial institution
Weight: 0.35
, educational system
Weight: 0.35
, graduate student
Weight: 0.34
, association
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality change 0.86
has quality systems 0.80
has quality worst 0.80
wait music poor quality 0.79
has shape solid 0.79
is good choice 0.78
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(center, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(center, wait music poor quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(center, wait music poor quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(center, has shape solid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(center, wait music poor quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(center, has shape solid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(graduate student, has quality worst)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(academy, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(center, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(center, wait music poor quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(academy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(academy, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(academy, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(graduate student, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(graduate student, has quality worst)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(institute, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(institute, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(institute, has quality evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality evil)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(institute, has quality evil)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(center, wait music poor quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(center, has shape solid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(academy, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(academy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(graduate student, has quality worst)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(center, wait music poor quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(center, has shape solid)