access: be good for databases

Related concepts

Parents	security system Weight: 0.61 , location Weight: 0.59 , consideration Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.59
Siblings	easement Weight: 0.59 , key Weight: 0.57 , egress Weight: 0.40 , internet service provider Weight: 0.35 , escort service Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for databases	1.00
be important in databases	0.98
be called relational database	0.84
is relational database	0.84
use data	0.77
duplicate records in query	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(location, use data) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(access, be good for databases)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(location, use data)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(location, use data)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(key, be important in databases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(location, use data) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(access, be good for databases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(key, be important in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(key, be important in databases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(access, be good for databases)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(access, be called relational database)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(access, be called relational database)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(access, is relational database)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(access, is relational database)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(access, duplicate records in query)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(access, duplicate records in query)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(access, is relational database)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(access, be called relational database)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(access, is relational database)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(access, duplicate records in query)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(access, duplicate records in query)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(access, be good for databases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(location, use data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(key, be important in databases)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(access, be good for databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(location, use data)