accommodation: be expensive in ma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents space
Weight: 0.59
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.62
, villa
Weight: 0.61
, cabin
Weight: 0.60
, lodging
Weight: 0.59
, meal
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in ma 1.00
be in copenhagen expensive 0.79
be in hawaii expensive 0.78
is kansas city mo 0.77
be in boston expensive 0.76
is expensive 0.75
is iwatch expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cottage, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(topic, is kansas city mo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cottage, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cottage, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accommodation, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accommodation, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(accommodation, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cottage, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city mo)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)