accommodation: be in copenhagen expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents space
Weight: 0.59
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.62
, villa
Weight: 0.61
, cabin
Weight: 0.60
, lodging
Weight: 0.59
, meal
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in copenhagen expensive 1.00
be in copenhagen 0.92
be in hawaii expensive 0.80
be in ibiza expensive 0.79
be in boston expensive 0.79
be expensive in ma 0.79
be in vancouver expensive 0.79
is expensive 0.78
is iwatch expensive 0.78
be in bali cheap 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(villa, be in ibiza expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cottage, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(villa, be in bali cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(villa, be in ibiza expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(villa, be in ibiza expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(villa, be in bali cheap)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(villa, be in bali cheap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cottage, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cottage, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in vancouver expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in vancouver expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in vancouver expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in vancouver expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in boston expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accommodation, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be expensive in ma)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accommodation, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(accommodation, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(villa, be in ibiza expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(villa, be in bali cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cottage, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)