:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
| Property |
Similarity |
| mean |
1.00 |
| do |
0.77 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department, mean)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cpa, do)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, mean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(banker, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, do)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lawyer, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cpa, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cpa, do)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(banker, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(banker, do)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(accountant, do)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(accountant, do)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(accountant, do)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(accountant, do)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(paralegal, mean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, do)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cpa, do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(banker, do)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child