accuracy: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.68
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.34
, speed
Weight: 0.34
, consistency
Weight: 0.34
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
be important in science 0.82
be important in scientific measurement 0.81
be crucial for science 0.79
be important to intps 0.78
be important at work 0.78
differ in scientific measurement 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(consistency, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in scientific measurement)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important at work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accuracy, be crucial for science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(accuracy, differ in scientific measurement)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(accuracy, differ in scientific measurement)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(accuracy, differ in scientific measurement)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important at work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, differ in scientific measurement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(accuracy, be crucial for science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be crucial for science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in scientific measurement)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in scientific measurement)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be crucial for science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in scientific measurement)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)