activity: affect local climates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect local climates 1.00
affect climates 0.95
affect climates including planting 0.86
affect micro climates including planting 0.85
affect climate 0.83
affect environment 0.80
cause climate change 0.78
affect natural environment 0.77
be negatively affecting businesses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect local climates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(activity, affect local climates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(activity, affect local climates)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, affect climate)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(activity, affect climate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect climate)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect local climates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(activity, affect local climates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(activity, affect local climates)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)