actor: be in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies 1.00
get in movies 0.98
make movies 0.96
do movies 0.96
be in bad movies 0.95
look in movies 0.94
move in movies 0.94
be in films 0.93
produce movies 0.93
eat in movies 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(villain, be in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(villain, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(villain, be in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(actor, be in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actor, eat in movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actor, eat in movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actor, eat in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actor, get in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(actor, look in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(actor, look in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(actor, eat in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(actor, look in movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(actor, look in movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actor, be in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(villain, be in movies)