actor: get in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
get in movies 1.00
be in movies 0.98
make movies 0.96
do movies 0.96
be in bad movies 0.95
look in movies 0.94
move in movies 0.94
eat in movies 0.93
do bad movies 0.93
produce movies 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(villain, be in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(villain, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(villain, be in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actor, get in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(actor, be in movies)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actor, be in movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actor, eat in movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actor, eat in movies)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(villain, be in movies)