actor: face audience

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, kim
Weight: 0.54
, eric
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
face audience 1.00
expect praise from audience 0.77
thank audience 0.76
be speak to crowd 0.76
talk to crowd 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(performer, thank audience)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(actor, face audience)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(performer, thank audience)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(performer, thank audience)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(politician, talk to crowd)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(performer, thank audience)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(actor, face audience)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(politician, talk to crowd)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(politician, talk to crowd)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(actor, face audience)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actor, expect praise from audience)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(actor, expect praise from audience)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(actor, expect praise from audience)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(actor, expect praise from audience)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(actor, face audience)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(performer, thank audience)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(politician, talk to crowd)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(actor, face audience)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(performer, thank audience)