politician: be speak to crowd

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents businessman
Weight: 0.70
, leader
Weight: 0.69
, actor
Weight: 0.66
, public servant
Weight: 0.65
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.76
, congressman
Weight: 0.71
, journalist
Weight: 0.70
, george bush
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be speak to crowd 1.00
talk to crowd 0.94
has respond to crowd 0.84
speak up 0.82
wave to crowd 0.81
be speak lie 0.79
speak his mind 0.79
face audience 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(actor, face audience)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, face audience)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(actor, face audience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(politician, be speak to crowd)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(politician, talk to crowd)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(politician, talk to crowd)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(politician, talk to crowd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(politician, talk to crowd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak lie)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(politician, be speak lie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(politician, be speak lie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(politician, be speak lie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(politician, wave to crowd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(actor, face audience)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(politician, be speak to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(actor, face audience)