politician: has respond to crowd

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents businessman
Weight: 0.70
, leader
Weight: 0.69
, actor
Weight: 0.66
, public servant
Weight: 0.65
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.76
, congressman
Weight: 0.71
, journalist
Weight: 0.70
, george bush
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has respond to crowd 1.00
be speak to crowd 0.84
talk to crowd 0.82
wave to crowd 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(politician, has respond to crowd)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(politician, talk to crowd)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(politician, talk to crowd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(politician, talk to crowd)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(politician, talk to crowd)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(politician, wave to crowd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(politician, has respond to crowd)