politician: wave to crowd

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents businessman
Weight: 0.70
, leader
Weight: 0.69
, actor
Weight: 0.66
, public servant
Weight: 0.65
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.76
, congressman
Weight: 0.71
, journalist
Weight: 0.70
, george bush
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
wave to crowd 1.00
talk to crowd 0.84
be speak to crowd 0.81
has respond to crowd 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(politician, wave to crowd)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(politician, talk to crowd)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(politician, talk to crowd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(politician, talk to crowd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(politician, talk to crowd)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, be speak to crowd)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politician, has respond to crowd)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(politician, has respond to crowd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(politician, wave to crowd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(politician, wave to crowd)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(politician, wave to crowd)