actress: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
has physical part skin 0.90
have shiny hair 0.82
have smooth hair 0.81
have shiny smooth hair 0.78
has physical part tits 0.77
have perfect skin 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(actress, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part skin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(actress, has physical part skin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, have smooth hair)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part tits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(actress, has physical part tits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(actress, has physical part tits)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part skin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(actress, have shiny hair)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, has physical part skin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(actress, have smooth hair)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(actress, have smooth hair)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part tits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(actress, have perfect skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(actress, have perfect skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(actress, have shiny hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(actress, have smooth hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(actress, have shiny hair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(actress, have perfect skin)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(actress, have shiny hair)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(actress, have shiny smooth hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part hair)