administration: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	authority Weight: 0.66 , program Weight: 0.63 , proposal Weight: 0.62 , official Weight: 0.62
Siblings	czar Weight: 0.42 , administrator Weight: 0.34 , plan Weight: 0.33 , council Weight: 0.33 , state police Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
is quality	0.91
is good thing	0.78
has quality definition	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(authority, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(authority, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(authority, is good thing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(authority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(authority, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administrator, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(plan, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(council, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(administration, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(administration, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(administration, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(administration, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(authority, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(administration, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(administrator, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(administrator, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(plan, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(plan, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(council, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(council, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(administration, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(administration, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(authority, is good thing)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(administrator, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(council, has quality definition)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(plan, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(authority, is good thing)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(administration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)