administration: is work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents authority
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.63
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
, official
Weight: 0.62
Siblings czar
Weight: 0.42
, administrator
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.33
, council
Weight: 0.33
, state police
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work 1.00
work 0.98
be with team work 0.81
need hard drive operate 0.76
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(proposal, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(administration, is work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, be with team work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(administration, is work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(proposal, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(program, be with team work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(proposal, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(program, be with team work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(proposal, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(administration, is work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, be with team work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(administration, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(administrator, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(administration, is work)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(administration, work)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(administration, work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(administration, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(administration, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(administration, is work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be with team work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(proposal, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be with team work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(administration, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(proposal, work)