administrator: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.68
, authority
Weight: 0.67
, program
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.64
, principal
Weight: 0.59
, provost
Weight: 0.59
, office worker
Weight: 0.35
, manager
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
is job description 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(authority, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(authority, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(authority, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(principal, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(authority, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(administrator, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(principal, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(principal, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(administrator, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(administrator, is job description)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(administrator, has state jobs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(administrator, is job description)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(administrator, is job description)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(administrator, is job description)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(administrator, has state jobs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(administrator, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(administrator, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(authority, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(principal, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(administrator, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(authority, has state jobs)