administrator: fail

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.68 , authority Weight: 0.67 , program Weight: 0.61 , person Weight: 0.61
Siblings	supervisor Weight: 0.64 , principal Weight: 0.59 , provost Weight: 0.59 , office worker Weight: 0.35 , manager Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
fail	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(program, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(administrator, fail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(program, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(program, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(manager, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(program, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(administrator, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(supervisor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(manager, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(manager, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(administrator, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(administrator, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(program, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(supervisor, fail)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(manager, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(administrator, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(program, fail)