adultery: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, religion
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.63
, vice
Weight: 0.61
, sin
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pedophilia
Weight: 0.34
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.34
, murder
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is ethical issue 0.84
is moral issue 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(adultery, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(adultery, is moral issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(adultery, is moral issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(adultery, is moral issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(adultery, is ethical issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(adultery, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)