adultery: is moral issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, religion
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.63
, vice
Weight: 0.61
, sin
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pedophilia
Weight: 0.34
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.34
, murder
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is moral issue 1.00
is moral 0.94
is ethical issue 0.88
is issue 0.84
is ethical 0.79
is morally wrong 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(murder, is morally wrong)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(murder, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(murder, is morally wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(adultery, is moral issue)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(adultery, is moral)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(adultery, is issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is ethical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(adultery, is moral)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(adultery, is issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(adultery, is moral)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(adultery, is issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(adultery, is ethical issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(adultery, is ethical)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(adultery, is ethical)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(adultery, is ethical)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(adultery, is moral issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(murder, is morally wrong)