african american: were treated in 1866

Property	Similarity
were treated in 1866	1.00
were treated in 1920s	1.00
were treated	1.00
were treated bad	0.95
were treated at home	0.93
were treated in past	0.92
were treated in south	0.92
be treated today	0.92
were in north treated	0.92
were treated during war	0.90

0.84

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(african american, were treated in 1920s)

0.84

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(african american, were treated)

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1920s)

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(african american, were treated)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1920s)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(african american, were treated)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(african american, were treated at home)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(african american, were treated at home)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(african american, were treated at home)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(african american, were treated in south)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Salient(african american, were treated in past)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(african american, be treated today)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(african american, be treated today)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(african american, were treated in past)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(african american, were treated in south)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated at home)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(african american, be treated today)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in south)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in past)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1920s)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in south)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in past)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(african american, be treated today)

Parents	african Weight: 0.81 , american Weight: 0.73 , asian Weight: 0.69 , new york city Weight: 0.68
Siblings	frederick douglass Weight: 0.70 , german Weight: 0.55 , native american Weight: 0.41 , george washington Weight: 0.39 , south america Weight: 0.38

african american: were treated in 1866

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings