african american: were treated in world war 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents african
Weight: 0.81
, american
Weight: 0.73
, asian
Weight: 0.69
, new york city
Weight: 0.68
Siblings frederick douglass
Weight: 0.70
, german
Weight: 0.55
, native american
Weight: 0.41
, george washington
Weight: 0.39
, south america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in world war 2 1.00
were treated in world war 1 0.99
were treated during war 0.91
were in world war 2 treated differently than white men 0.90
were treated during period after war 0.86
were treated in 1866 0.86
were treated in 1920s 0.86
were treated 0.84
were treated bad 0.83
were treated at home 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(native american, were treated)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in world war 1)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in world war 1)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 1)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(african american, were in world war 2 treated differently than white men)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(african american, were in world war 2 treated differently than white men)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(african american, were in world war 2 treated differently than white men)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(african american, were in world war 2 treated differently than white men)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(african american, were treated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(african american, were treated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(african american, were treated at home)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(african american, were treated at home)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated at home)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated at home)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 1)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)