agent: has color orange

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color orange 1.00
orange 0.95
has color yellow 0.93
use blue ink 0.78
use pink ribbon 0.77
wear black 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, use pink ribbon)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(solicitor, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(solicitor, use pink ribbon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(solicitor, use pink ribbon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(agent, has color orange)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(agent, orange)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(agent, orange)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(agent, orange)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(agent, orange)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(agent, has color orange)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(solicitor, use pink ribbon)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)