attorney: use blue ink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use blue ink 1.00
use ink 0.96
use yellow paper 0.82
has color yellow 0.79
has color orange 0.78
use paper 0.77
have black printers 0.75
has color grey 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(office, have black printers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(office, has color grey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(witness, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(witness, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(agent, has color orange)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(office, has color grey)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(office, have black printers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, has color orange)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(witness, has color yellow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(office, have black printers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(office, has color grey)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, use yellow paper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, use paper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(witness, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(office, have black printers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(office, has color grey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(agent, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(solicitor, use paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(solicitor, use paper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(solicitor, use yellow paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(solicitor, use yellow paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(attorney, use blue ink)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attorney, use ink)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(attorney, use ink)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(attorney, use ink)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(agent, has color orange)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(witness, has color yellow)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(office, has color grey)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(office, have black printers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solicitor, use paper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(solicitor, use yellow paper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(witness, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(agent, has color orange)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(office, have black printers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(attorney, use blue ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(office, has color grey)