attorney: use ink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use ink 1.00
use blue ink 0.96
use paper 0.79
use yellow paper 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, use yellow paper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, use paper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(solicitor, use paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(solicitor, use paper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(solicitor, use yellow paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(solicitor, use yellow paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(attorney, use ink)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use blue ink)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(attorney, use blue ink)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, use blue ink)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(attorney, use blue ink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attorney, use ink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solicitor, use paper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attorney, use ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(solicitor, use yellow paper)