aging: affect athletic performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect athletic performance 1.00
affect to academic performance 0.84
affect performance 0.84
affect to performance 0.84
affect to performance of students 0.81
affect to academic performance of students 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aging, affect athletic performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(aging, affect athletic performance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(aging, affect athletic performance)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aging, affect performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(aging, affect performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(aging, affect performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect athletic performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aging, affect athletic performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(aging, affect athletic performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)