aging: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
be hard 0.99
is difficult 0.82
were difficult in andersonville 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aging, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aging, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(issue, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(thyroid problem, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(aging, is hard)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(aging, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(thyroid problem, is hard)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(thyroid problem, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aging, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aging, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(thyroid problem, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(aging, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)