condition: were difficult in andersonville

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents situation
Weight: 0.66
, obligation
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.72
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.72
, renal failure
Weight: 0.71
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.70
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were difficult in andersonville 1.00
be on moon difficult 0.79
were bad in early 1900s 0.79
be important in servicescapes 0.78
were for japanese-americans 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(condition, be on moon difficult)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(condition, be on moon difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(condition, be on moon difficult)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(condition, be on moon difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condition, were bad in early 1900s)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(condition, were bad in early 1900s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(condition, were bad in early 1900s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(condition, were bad in early 1900s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)