ai: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.52
, program
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, city
Weight: 0.45
, artist
Weight: 0.44
Siblings di
Weight: 0.31
, bing
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, september
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is good thing 0.97
is thing 0.94
is big thing 0.91
is next big thing 0.84
is next thing 0.83
be good for us 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bing, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bing, is thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bing, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ai, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ai, is thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ai, is thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ai, is thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ai, is next thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ai, is good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ai, is good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ai, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ai, is big thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ai, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ai, is next thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ai, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ai, is next thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ai, is next big thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ai, is big thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ai, be good for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ai, be good for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ai, is next thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ai, is next big thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ai, is big thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ai, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ai, is next big thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ai, is next big thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ai, is big thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ai, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ai, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bing, is thing)