aid: be necessity in asia pacific region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wetsuit
Weight: 0.42
, sextant
Weight: 0.36
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.36
, grant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear war
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessity in asia pacific region 1.00
be important in south africa 0.80
be prevalent in south africa 0.79
be important in africa 0.79
be more common in africa 0.78
be high in south africa 0.78
be most common in africa 0.78
be prevalent in africa 0.78
be with north korea 0.77
be in africa problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nuclear war, be with north korea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nuclear war, be with north korea)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear war, be with north korea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be important in africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aid, be more common in africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be prevalent in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(aid, be most common in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aid, be more common in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be most common in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(aid, be prevalent in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(aid, be important in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aid, be prevalent in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(aid, be more common in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aid, be important in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aid, be most common in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(aid, be prevalent in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(aid, be more common in africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aid, be most common in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aid, be necessity in asia pacific region)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear war, be with north korea)