aid: be related in africa today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wetsuit
Weight: 0.42
, sextant
Weight: 0.36
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.36
, grant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear war
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related in africa today 1.00
be related in africa 0.98
be in africa 0.93
be important in africa 0.93
be bad in africa 0.92
be bad for africa 0.92
be high in africa 0.91
be more common in africa 0.91
contribute in africa 0.90
be important in south africa 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(aid, be related in africa today)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aid, be in africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be important in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(aid, be bad in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aid, be bad for africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be high in africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aid, be in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aid, be important in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aid, be more common in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aid, contribute in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(aid, be bad in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aid, be in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aid, be high in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(aid, be important in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aid, be bad for africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aid, be bad in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(aid, be more common in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aid, be bad for africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aid, be high in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(aid, contribute in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(aid, be more common in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(aid, contribute in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aid, be bad in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aid, be bad for africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aid, be in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aid, be more common in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aid, be high in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(aid, contribute in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aid, be related in africa today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(aid, be related in africa today)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(aid, be related in africa today)