air pollution: be worse than than rural areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than than rural areas 1.00
be higher in urban areas 0.86
be more of problem in industrial areas 0.82
get worse 0.80
be worse in developing countries 0.79
be worse in winter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pollution, be worse in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pollution, be worse in winter)