pollution: be worse in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse in winter 1.00
be problem during summer 0.78
be worse than than rural areas 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(smog, be problem during summer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(smog, be problem during summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(smog, be problem during summer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pollution, be worse in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pollution, be worse in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smog, be worse in winter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(smog, be problem during summer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be worse in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(air pollution, be worse than than rural areas)