airbag: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.52
Siblings electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, cooling device
Weight: 0.34
, windshield wiper
Weight: 0.34
, brake
Weight: 0.34
, car alarm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(airbag, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(airbag, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(airbag, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(airbag, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(airbag, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(airbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)