device: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
be good for 10 years 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cartridge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cartridge, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cartridge, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cartridge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer monitor, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(device, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cartridge, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cartridge, has quality bad)