smoke detector: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.75 , fire alarm Weight: 0.72 , alarm Weight: 0.71 , electronic device Weight: 0.70
Siblings	ionization Weight: 0.39 , smoke alarm Weight: 0.39 , cooling device Weight: 0.36 , car alarm Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality change	0.86
has quality price	0.80
be good for 10 years	0.78
has quality questions	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(ionization, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(smoke detector, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(ionization, has quality change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)