ionization: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.46
, factor
Weight: 0.42
, issue
Weight: 0.41
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.39
Siblings combustion
Weight: 0.34
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, oxidation
Weight: 0.33
, hydrogen
Weight: 0.33
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is chemical change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(oxidation, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(photosynthesis, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, is chemical change)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ionization, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(ionization, is chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ionization, is chemical change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(ionization, is chemical change)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ionization, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ionization, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ionization, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, is chemical change)