oxidation: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.63
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.58
, temperature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, combustion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality bad 0.86
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digestion, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(digestion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digestion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(digestion, is chemical change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(oxidation, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(oxidation, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digestion, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)