airplane: be used to traverse sky

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.65
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings jet
Weight: 0.57
, aircraft
Weight: 0.36
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.35
, car
Weight: 0.35
, engine
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to traverse sky 1.00
be at sky 0.83
be at in sky 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be at in sky)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be at sky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aircraft, be at sky)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(aircraft, be at sky)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(aircraft, be at in sky)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(aircraft, be at in sky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(airplane, be used to traverse sky)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(airplane, be at in sky)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be at in sky)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(airplane, be at in sky)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(airplane, be at in sky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to traverse sky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aircraft, be at sky)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to traverse sky)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(aircraft, be at in sky)